₹1.8 Cr for 3BHK in Sector 82A — is this super area ratio typical?
₹1.8 Cr for a 3BHK in Sector 82A, Vohra Estate is quoting. From my experience, super area figures often hide a lot of wasted space. They're showing 1800 sqft super area, but carpet area feels really low, maybe 1100-1200 sqft max. Is this normal practice in Gurugram now for new projects? I've seen this pattern before, but the difference seems bigger here. I'm trying to calculate the real per sqft cost based on carpet area for ROI projections. Builder bol raha hai ki it's standard, but my gut says they're inflating numbers for a higher ticket size. Should I push for a better carpet area to super area ratio, ya fir this is the new normal for investment? What's your take on this? How much percentage difference is acceptable for a good deal? Any recent experiences with Vohra Estate or similar projects in Sector 82A where you felt this super area thing was a bit off? Trying to make a calculated risk, yaar.
Comments
Bhai, you hit the nail on the head! 1800 super area for 1100-1200 carpet? That's almost 35-40% difference, which is just too much, especially for ₹1.8 Cr. I faced a similar situation with a project near Badshahpur a couple of years ago. They showed 1600 sqft super area, but the actual usable space was barely 1000 sqft. It felt like I was paying for air and common areas I barely use. Vohra Estate ka track record bhi utna clean nahi