Amenities are often a financial drain, not an asset

The perceived value of amenities in New Delhi projects is often inflated, rarely translating into superior ROI. For The Kings Homes, I'm concerned about the gap between promised and actual amenities post-possession. Kya yeh bas ek marketing gimmick hai? High maintenance charges often don't reflect service quality, directly impacting net rental yields. Do these elaborate clubhouses genuinely attract premium tenants, or are they underutilized assets simply driving up costs? My analysis suggests minimal long-term benefit. Disagree? Tell me why.