Canvas maintenance: are we paying for ghost amenities?
Since moving into Canvas last month, I've noticed a few things that weren't obvious during booking. First, the parking allocation is a bit of a maze; we were told one thing, but getting a second spot is proving tricky, almost lottery-based. Wish I'd dug deeper into that clause. Also, the maintenance charges feel steep for what we actually get. The clubhouse and sports facilities are often under-utilized or closed for private bookings, not really for daily resident use. It makes me wonder if we're paying for ghost facilities. What's the best way to approach society management about getting more value for these charges? Or ensuring better access to amenities we're funding? Any hacks for new residents to actually make use of what's promised? Hope this helps someone clarify these details before possession.
Comments
Coming back to U1's original question: What's the best way to approach society management about getting more value for these charges? Is there a formal process, or should we just gather a group of residents and raise the issue? I'm worried about being seen as a 'troublemaker' but also don't want to keep paying for things I can't use.
Good advice, U8! But what if the society management itself is hand-in-glove with the builder in the initial years? Does Canvas already have an elected society body or is it builder-controlled?
Haan bhai, U8 is spot on. Collective voice works best.
U5, definitely gather residents first. Strength in numbers, always. Form a WhatsApp group, document all issues with photos/videos, and then draft a formal letter to the society management. Don't go solo. Make sure to reference the brochure promises versus actual delivery. That usually gets their attention.
This is why I'm so hesitant to book anything right now. My friend bought a flat in Amanora Park Town, and even there, with a reputed builder, they had issues with common area maintenance and security charges initially. It took almost two years of constant follow-ups with the society management and even some legal notices to get things streamlined. The Pune real estate market is booming, but transparency often takes a backseat, especially for first-time buyers like us who get swayed by glossy brochures. Always read the fine print, especially for common areas and amenity access.
Hmm, this is concerning. I was under the impression Canvas was a solid project, especially with the price range (₹1.2 Cr – ₹2.1 Cr). Is this a common issue with this builder, or specific to Canvas? Also, for those who've booked, did you check the RERA number (P52100077008) details for any red flags about amenities or possession date (2029-12-01)?
Exactly, U6! Builders often promise the moon during sales. I've seen it happen multiple times in the Pune market. They show you fancy renders of clubhouses and swimming pools, but then the actual execution is half-hearted, or they become revenue streams for private events. For Canvas, with 454 total units, they should have robust facilities, not just 'ghost' ones. It's a classic bait and switch tactic to justify higher maintenance charges.
U3, you're right to ask about the builder. Their track record isn't spotless, especially with delivery timelines. My cousin booked with them near Akurdi a few years back, and possession was delayed by almost a year. Amenities were also a point of contention later. RERA only guarantees so much, the fine print for amenities is where they get you.
Totally relate to this, bhai! We are also considering Canvas, and the sales team makes everything sound so perfect. Your post is a real eye-opener. The 'ghost amenities' part especially resonates, I've heard similar complaints from friends in other new societies. Thank you for sharing this candid feedback.
Since moving into Canvas last month, I've noticed a few things that weren't obvious during booking. First, the parking allocation is a bit of a maze; we were told one thing, but getting a second spot is proving tricky, almost lottery-based. Wish I'd dug deeper into that clause. Also, the maintenance charges feel steep for what we actually get. The clubhouse and sports facilities are often under-utilized or closed for private bookings, not really for daily resident use. It makes me wonder if we're paying for ghost facilities. What's the best way to approach society management about getting more value for these charges? Or ensuring better access to amenities we're funding? Any hacks for new residents to actually make use of what's promised? Hope this helps someone clarify these details before possession.